Trump v Biden & Wallace, Debate 9.29.2020

Folks, last nights debate was a falsification. That is my impression. The Biden campaign refused a drug test and ear inspection for the "show". If they didn't have anything to hide why would they refuse?

By all appearances the Left has dreaded such a confrontation between Trump and Biden. And Yet they could not, NOT debate. So what do they do? It is astonishing how inventive they are at indulging in evil and deceit! THEY CHEAT!! Was Biden on a stimulus drug? We were not allowed to know. Apparently everyone allowed into the auditorium was tested for the common cold (aka covid-19) (btw be sure to read the little "BTW below). They had time to do that - but drug test? Ear inspection? No, they were not going to do that.

We don't think like they do because we see things in terms of true or false. But they ALWAYS seek to hide what they do because if we know what they're doing they would FAIL every time. They reject the Truth. To them it doesn't matter how you win so long as you win. ANY means in the name of the results is justified.

So we don't know WHO was really on stage with Trump. Biden's carcass was there but where was Joe Biden? That's the first feature of this hoodwink. But it wasn't the only feature.

Just how many people were debating Trump? There was some facsimile believed to be Joe Biden but there was also - quite obviously - Chris Wallace; a bought and paid for LEFTIST Shill. Let us not forget; the Spin of all that the Left does in regards to Trump is to MAKE TRUMP LOOK BAD!! Period. They cannot make their communist Ideas good enough to defeat him! So he must take a fall. Isn't it obvious? Nor do they leave anything to chance. It wasn't enough that Joe had a plug in his ear and he was doped up. They insured the plan by putting a third party they can count on to divide Trumps attention. I never saw Chris really call out Joe for "breaking" the rules as he did Trump! Trump Bad. Joe Good. Joe play by rules (never mind all the LIES - BLATANT LIES - that came out of his mouth; the Truth doesn't matter).

Here is the little gem we all can take from this; If Joe "wins" in November and survives for  4 years we will not know who the actual president is - We will only have this animated PUPPET!

Joe started LYING right from the beginning. As far as I'm concerned whatever Donald did after that was JUSTIFIED!! Two liars on stage; two leftist Communists against a man who has America first in mind (the communists always have and always WILL hate America). Trump broke no Rules - because there were no rules.

 Covidiot Derrell

Reposting this Important Article for everyone to read - 2012 Article by Michael S. Coffman PhD about our favorite freedom Grinch G e o r g e S 0 R 0 S with new comment from David Skinner

http://rangemagazine.com/features/fall-20/range-fa20-a_perfect_storm.pdf 

Red Flag: "Oppose a Disease at its Beginning"

Red Flag: "Oppose a Disease at its Beginning"

Alex Newman is Taking the Fight to Public Schools

Roger Stone on Tucker Last Night

Deep State Collusion within the Federal Reserve System

Politics has turned into war for what's left of the Republic.

Rule of Law v. Mob Rule
by Rick Jore
in Guest Posted on

12/31/2018 07:15 PM

GUEST BLOG POST by Rick Jore

In a Valley Journal article published last week reporting on the swearing in ceremony of Lake County elected officials, Twentieth Judicial District Judge James Manley twice referred to "this experiment we call democracy."

I can understand why Judge Manley might say this as we often (erroneously, in my view) call our form of government a "democracy." However, I hope you will further ponder his statement that "our forefathers developed" such form of government and consider if history actually bears that view out. Is democracy consistent with a Constitutional Republic? Can, or should, a simple vote of any democratic majority, whether direct or representative, negate or supersede intended constitutional restraints on the power and authority of government or the constitutionally recognized and secured rights of the individual? If so, what purpose could the oath the elected officials took possibly have if the extent of their authority is determined not by the Constitution, but by a majority of voters?

The word democracy does not appear in any of our organic documents of government. Art. IV Sec. 4 of the U.S. Constitution guarantees "to every State in this Union, a Republican Form of Government." (Republican as in a system of civil rule conducive to a republic, not Republican as in political party.)

If, as Judge Manley says, "our forefathers developed" a "democracy," it is rather odd they said what they did about the concept:

"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; have in general been as short in their lives as they are violent in their deaths.” ~ James Madison, Federalist #10

"Democracy will envy all, contend with all, endeavour to pull down all; and when by chance it happens to get the Upper hand for a Short time, it will be revengeful bloody and cruel.” ~ John Adams letter to Thomas Jefferson, July 16, 1814

You may be aware of a current nationwide effort to nullify a specific constitutional check on democracy, the loud and ignorant call to eliminate the Electoral College provision in the U.S. Constitution. A significantly foundational and constitutional check on democracy has already been eliminated, with disastrous consequences, by adoption of the 17th Amendment in 1913. This changed entirely the function and purpose of the United States Senate by replacing senatorial appointments by state legislatures with popular election.

Let’s be mindful and cautious in referring to our representative, constitutional republic as a democracy. Allow me to suggest that transcendent truths, which were pronounced as self-evident by our forefathers, simply cannot be maintained by the fickle whims of an all too often selfish and covetous democratic majority. By the franchise of their vote, a democratic majority will seek to appease their selfish and covetous nature by using the force of law to plunder rights and property, rather than protect them.

Rick Jore served four terms in the Montana House of Representatives, three as a member of the Republican Party and one as a member of the Constitution Party. He is a small business owner, constitutional originalist, and dedicated activist working to restore our founding heritage.